<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Denver SEO Image Results Are Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://denverseocompany.com/denver-seo-image-results-are-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://denverseocompany.com/denver-seo-image-results-are-back/</link>
	<description>Other SEO Companies in Denver WISH they had our experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 18:02:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: knox</title>
		<link>http://denverseocompany.com/denver-seo-image-results-are-back/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>knox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 01:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://denverseocompany.com/?p=34#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Direct image links and pages 301&#039;d to jpg&#039;s have affected this as well on some other projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Direct image links and pages 301&#8242;d to jpg&#8217;s have affected this as well on some other projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HighPoint SEO</title>
		<link>http://denverseocompany.com/denver-seo-image-results-are-back/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>HighPoint SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 19:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://denverseocompany.com/?p=34#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Hi Zack, 
I&#039;m glad you wrote this post.   I had been noticing  the increase in image indexing across a lot of verticals, so this was partially an experiment.  I wanted to see how much alt tags actually mattered, vs. the file name etc...

As you can see, we didn&#039;t use the term &quot;Denver SEO&quot;, in our alt attributes, and no title, we strictly used the term in the file name and it ranked in less than 2 weeks.    

Unfortunately these results don&#039;t define the single on-site factor that is MORE important: surrounding content, the title, alt description, or file name, but it does show what the main on-site rankings factors are. 

The one factor that isn&#039;t investigated here are the links to the page (or to the images themselves) and how they influence the rankings of image.  To take this post a bit further and examine the links would be pretty beneficial to all reading.

Good post as usual!

Cheers, 
Chris Gragg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zack,<br />
I&#8217;m glad you wrote this post.   I had been noticing  the increase in image indexing across a lot of verticals, so this was partially an experiment.  I wanted to see how much alt tags actually mattered, vs. the file name etc&#8230;</p>
<p>As you can see, we didn&#8217;t use the term &#8220;Denver SEO&#8221;, in our alt attributes, and no title, we strictly used the term in the file name and it ranked in less than 2 weeks.    </p>
<p>Unfortunately these results don&#8217;t define the single on-site factor that is MORE important: surrounding content, the title, alt description, or file name, but it does show what the main on-site rankings factors are. </p>
<p>The one factor that isn&#8217;t investigated here are the links to the page (or to the images themselves) and how they influence the rankings of image.  To take this post a bit further and examine the links would be pretty beneficial to all reading.</p>
<p>Good post as usual!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Chris Gragg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
